Evildoers – Bandwidth

Evildoers: Those Who Drain Bandwidth

Welcome to the Bandwidth list of those who by common sense standards are subtracting from the bandwidth of humanity:

Not all obstacles to progress are random; some are deliberately created. Evildoers are those who diminish bandwidth, obstructing truth, efficiency, and the natural flow of progress. Their actions, whether through force, deception, or manipulation, erode resources, limit freedoms, and hinder the ability of individuals and societies to thrive.

To be listed here, an individual or entity must actively reduce bandwidth. Individuals on this list have engaged in activities that restrict societal bandwidth—reducing efficiency, promoting misinformation, obstructing progress, or undermining personal freedoms. Their actions include:

Deception or Fraud – Misleading the public, engaging in dishonest financial practices, or propagating false narratives.

Obstruction of Progress – Advocating for policies or actions that hinder innovation, economic freedom, or individual autonomy.

Exploitation of Systems – Using political, financial, or social influence to manipulate systems for personal or ideological gain, often at the expense of societal efficiency.

Suppression of Truth – Promoting censorship, stifling debate, or enforcing ideological conformity rather than fostering open discourse.

Liars and Cheats – Those who distort truth for personal gain, corrupting information flow and causing inefficiencies.

Murderers and Thieves – Those who take life or property, removing energy and resources from individuals or society.

Shakedown Artists and Scammers – Those who exploit systems for unearned advantage, draining wealth and trust.

Organizers Against Positive Endeavors – Those who work to suppress innovation, knowledge, or human advancement.

Corruption and Favoritism – Using positions of power to engage in unethical favoritism, cronyism, or conflicts of interest that reduce transparency and trust.

Enemies of Personal Freedom – Those who seek to control, restrict, or oppress without justification beyond their own power or ideology.

Whether through coercion, fraud, or obstruction, these individuals and groups consume more than they create, They are leaches or leach enablers, the worst kind of bandwidth destroyer, leaving society weaker, less informed, and less capable. Identifying and countering their influence is essential to protecting and expanding the bandwidth that drives progress and freedom.

Asshole of The Month – Adam Schiff

Adam Schiff, A red dirty diaper doper baby. A lawyer who created a false transcript of a phone call made by the President of the United States, a possible treasonous act.

The Inquisition (c. 200 – 1450): Spanning centuries and regions, was a systematic effort by the Catholic Church to enforce religious conformity, often through persecution, censorship, and violence. From a bandwidth perspective, the Inquisition stifled intellectual growth, suppressed scientific exploration, and fractured social cohesion by instilling fear and silencing dissent. The persecution of heretics, scientists, and cultural minorities diverted energy from innovation and progress, creating an atmosphere of repression that hindered societal development. While intended to preserve religious orthodoxy, the Inquisition exemplifies how rigid dogma and oppressive mechanisms can undermine collective potential and reduce the bandwidth available for human advancement.

Genghis Khan (c. 1162–1227): Mass death and destruction, though contributed to trade and cultural exchange. Arguably contributed to globalization.

The Destruction of the Aztecs and Mayans (16th century): The conquest and subsequent destruction of the Aztec and Mayan civilizations by European colonizers marked the loss of advanced cultures rich in knowledge, innovation, and societal structure. These civilizations had developed sophisticated systems in mathematics, astronomy, agriculture, and architecture, which represented significant contributions to human bandwidth. The violent imposition of foreign rule, the eradication of cultural heritage, and the suppression of indigenous knowledge systems disrupted the progression of their societies and diminished global diversity. This period exemplifies how conquest-driven destruction can collapse bandwidth, replacing collaborative growth with stagnation and loss of potential for shared advancement.

The Spanish conquistadors, who played a primary role in these conquests, were representatives of the Catholic Spanish Empire. They often justified their actions under the guise of religious conversion, claiming to bring Christianity to the “heathen” peoples of the New World. Catholic missionaries, including members of orders such as the Franciscans and Dominicans, accompanied these expeditions and sought to convert indigenous populations to Christianity.

While some missionaries sought peaceful conversion and attempted to preserve elements of indigenous culture, many others actively destroyed native religious practices, sacred texts, and cultural symbols, viewing them as pagan or heretical. The Catholic Church’s role in the colonization process was thus deeply intertwined with the broader destruction of indigenous civilizations, both physically and culturally. This religious justification often masked or enabled the economic exploitation and territorial ambitions of the colonizers, further compounding the disruption and loss of societal bandwidth in these once-thriving civilizations.

East India Company (1600–1874): Exploitation of local populations, forced monopolies, and contributing to famines in colonial regions.

Leopold II of Belgium (1835–1909): Exploited the Congo, leading to millions of deaths through forced labor.

The Opium Wars (1839–1842 and 1856–1860): stand as a stark example of how exploitation and imperialism disrupted societal bandwidth. These conflicts, primarily between Britain and China, arose from British efforts to force opium trade upon China, undermining its sovereignty and social fabric. The wars devastated China’s economy, eroded public health, and fractured its governance, leaving a legacy of chaos and diminished global standing. From a bandwidth perspective, the Opium Wars exemplify how greed and coercion can destabilize civilizations, diverting resources and energy away from development and collective progress.

Adolf Hitler (1889–1945): Initiated World War II, orchestrated the Holocaust, and suppressed intellectual freedom

The Nazi Regime (1933–1945): Suppression of scientific progress, persecution of dissenters, and the brutal enforcement of dogma through torture and execution.

Khmer Rouge (1975–1979): Genocide in Cambodia, dismantling of education and health systems, mass executions of intellectuals.

Joseph Stalin (1878–1953): Purges, famine-inducing policies, and suppression of dissent.

Kim Jong Un: Dictatorial control over North Korea, suppression of freedom and innovation. His regime enforces strict control over information, suppresses dissent, and isolates North Korea from global systems, significantly reducing the bandwidth of its citizens and the country as a whole.

Saul Alinski: Architect of Division and Bandwidth Disruption, a leftist community organizer and author of Rules for Radicals, developed a playbook for manipulation and societal disruption that has influenced many modern political figures, including Hillary Clinton. His strategies, rooted in exploiting division and fostering chaos, have been adopted widely, leading to significant reductions in societal bandwidth. Explore how his legacy continues to impact societal cohesion and survival today.

Present Day A fun compilation brought to you by X.

Communism: The anti-bandwidth nature of communism, particularly as implemented in the 20th century, lies in how the system restricts the free flow of ideas, suppresses individual initiative, and stifles innovation.

Democrats: Democrats have long been bent on destroying the republic. From Fort Sumter to Trans genderism, it is all destructive, morally, socially and philosophically.

United Nations: Explore how the United Nations, despite its noble charter, has contributed to the disruption of humanity’s bandwidth through inefficiencies, political bias, and unintended consequences. This page critically examines the UN’s role in fostering division, prolonging conflicts, and imposing global agendas that often undermine progress and survival. Discover the structural flaws, operational challenges, and areas in need of reform to align the UN’s actions with its original mission of amplifying global cooperation and development.

World Health Organization: Explore how the World Health Organization (WHO), despite its charter to advance global health, has disrupted the bandwidth of humanity through bureaucratic inefficiencies, political biases, and mismanagement of priorities. This page examines the challenges posed by external funding dependencies, inconsistent crisis responses, and the overreach of regulatory frameworks, all of which hinder its mission to foster global well-being. Dive into the complexities of reforming the WHO to better align with its core purpose and amplify the collective bandwidth of humanity.

The Sierra Club (1892–Present): Promotes environmental conservation but employs divisive tactics and bandwidth restrictive policies. While the Sierra Club’s efforts have had significant positive impacts on environmental conservation, there are elements of the club’s philosophy and tactics that can be argued to have a negative survival bandwidth effect on the broader population. We saved the tree from man using it to build shelter so the beetles can eat it.

Non Government Organizations: NGOs diminish a nation’s bandwidth as bureaucratic, donor-driven leach organizations misaligned with local needs. If an NGO creates dependency rather than fostering independence, it drains a country’s capacity for self-reliance. Poor coordination among NGOs can lead to redundancy, inefficiencies, and conflicting initiatives, overwhelming local governments rather than strengthening them. Additionally, when external organizations impose solutions without cultural alignment or accountability, they disrupt local agency, creating friction and inefficiency rather than progress. NGOs consume bandwidth rather than increase it, slowing national development and creating long-term inefficiencies.

Global Warning / Climate Change: “Climate Change” is the “Cause” of last resort. There is no definitive way for individuals or the population in general to actually measure it. The Government controls the sources of information through NASA and NOAA. Those are easily corrupted. This critical examination highlights the bandwidth implications of incorrect data used in the climate debate, particularly in how data is presented, validated, and acted upon. Specific bandwidth detractors include:

Al Gore

Greta Thunburg

United Nations

FBI: The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the central law enforcement agency in the US, plays a critical role in maintaining national security and enforcing federal laws. However, critiques have emerged regarding the agency’s selective investigations—both through acts of commission (active targeting) and omission (failing to act)—which have implications for public trust, societal fairness, and systemic bandwidth. Specific bandwidth destroyers include:

James Comey

Christopher Wray

Peter Strzok

Lisa Page

Regulations: This paper explores the unintended consequences of regulations on bandwidth and innovation, highlighting how compliance requirements, such as the CE marking system in Europe, create significant barriers to market entry and technological progress. It examines the increased costs, resource diversion, and market fragmentation caused by national and international regulations, as well as their disproportionate impact on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and emerging technologies. The paper concludes with recommendations for harmonizing standards, tailoring requirements, and fostering innovation-friendly regulatory frameworks to mitigate these challenges.

Education System: The current educational system has increasingly struggled to add to the bandwidth of present-day society with the efficiency and vigor that modern challenges demand. While education has traditionally been a powerful tool for expanding human potential, its structure often falls short in adapting to the rapid pace of technological advancement and societal change. Outdated curricula frequently prioritize rote memorization over critical thinking, problem-solving, and adaptability—skills essential for navigating the complexities of today’s world. Moreover, rigid institutional frameworks and standardized testing regimes often emphasize conformity and narrow definitions of success, stifling innovation and creativity.

Additionally, the system often fails to integrate advancements in cognitive science and technology that could personalize and enhance learning experiences. This neglect leaves students ill-prepared to contribute effectively to a knowledge-based economy and weakens their capacity to critically engage with misinformation and complexity. Furthermore, inequalities in access to quality education exacerbate societal divides, reducing overall bandwidth by sidelining the potential contributions of underrepresented or marginalized populations. By clinging to legacy systems and resisting reform, education risks becoming a bottleneck rather than a bandwidth multiplier in the progress of society.

ESG: Social, and Governance (ESG) frameworks through the lens of “adding bandwidth” to society allows us to assess both the potential benefits and challenges of these initiatives. While ESG starts with noble intentions—such as fostering equality, sustainability, and ethical corporate governance—it can also produce outcomes that may fail to maximize or even subtract from societal bandwidth when poorly implemented or overly costly.

Black Lives Matter: While this starts with a simple concept recognizing the value of blacks as part of the human race its result was that one race is more important than another.

In addition of the BLM, we have had the

KKK, The first of the Democrats long list of goons:
CRT,
CORE,
ACLU,
NLRB,
SCLC,
SNCC,
NAACP,
ANTIFA,
Color of Change,
Dream Defenders,
Black Panther Party,
Nation of Islam (NOI),
Black Hebrew Israelites,
Equal Justice Initiative (EJI),
National Urban League (NUL),
Harlem Renaissance Collectives,
Black Arts Movement (1960s-70s),
Movement for Black Lives (M4BL),
African Methodist Episcopal Church (AME).

LGBTQ: This analysis seeks to explore the bandwidth implications of the LGBTQ+ movement without judgment, focusing on its role in societal systems and contributions to survival.

Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity: Mediocrity over Merit. Goals are rooted in ideals of justice and fairness, the application and focus on DEI programs—especially when misaligned or overly prioritized—can have profound implications for the bandwidth of society and its survival capabilities.

Sanctuary Cities: By shielding illegal immigrants from federal law enforcement, can strain society’s bandwidth by diverting resources away from lawful citizens and fostering environments where criminal elements can operate with reduced accountability. By refusing to cooperate with immigration authorities, these cities allow repeat offenders to remain in communities, increasing crime rates and placing additional burdens on law enforcement, healthcare, and social services. This not only endangers public safety but also forces taxpayers to fund systems that protect individuals who may contribute to societal instability rather than productivity. In effect, sanctuary policies create inefficiencies, reducing the overall capacity of a society to function effectively and allocate resources where they are most needed.

American Civil Liberties Union: General advocate for anything that clogs the gears of society. Example: Sued the Trump administration over Trump’s executive order targeting birthright citizenship.

“Denying citizenship to U.S.-born children is not only unconstitutional — it’s also a reckless and ruthless repudiation of American values,” ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said in a statement. “Birthright citizenship is part of what makes the United States the strong and dynamic nation that it is.”

Intermediaries: Introduce noise, symbol confusion, inefficiencies, distort incentives, disinformation, or prioritize their own interests at the expense of the system’s intended purpose.

New York Times. Years of misinformation. Immoral.

National Review. Conservative mouthpiece of the elite Cadillac and country club set of the ivy league entitled.

MSNBC, CNN, and ABC Media outlets that exclusively broadcast left- or right-leaning narratives and criticize opposing perspectives impose significant bandwidth limitations on society. By narrowing the scope of information and reinforcing ideological silos, such practices contribute to several critical inefficiencies and challenges:

Distorted Reality and Incomplete Information: Polarized media often presents a selective view of events, omitting key facts or alternative perspectives that could provide a more comprehensive understanding. This distortion reduces the public’s ability to make informed decisions, effectively shrinking societal bandwidth by limiting access to unbiased and balanced information.

Amplification of Echo Chambers: By catering to specific ideological bases, these media outlets reinforce preexisting biases, creating echo chambers where only like-minded opinions are validated. This discourages critical thinking and open debate, impeding the intellectual cross-pollination necessary for societal progress.

Erosion of Trust in Institutions: Constant criticism of opposing viewpoints fosters division and distrust, not only toward other ideologies but also toward journalism as a whole. This diminishes the role of media as a neutral arbiter of truth, further reducing its bandwidth contribution to society.

Distraction from Critical Issues: Partisan media often prioritizes sensationalism and ideological disputes over substantive reporting on pressing issues. This diverts attention from solutions and meaningful discourse, squandering bandwidth on polarizing rhetoric rather than constructive engagement.

Barriers to Collaboration: The polarization fueled by biased reporting discourages collaboration across political or ideological lines, limiting the societal capacity to solve complex problems that require diverse input and shared efforts.

To address these bandwidth limitations, fostering media literacy and encouraging the development of platforms committed to neutrality and evidence-based reporting are critical. Open access to diverse viewpoints, fact-checking mechanisms, and transparent editorial practices can help rebuild trust and expand the bandwidth of societal discourse. By moving beyond polarization, media can reclaim its role as a facilitator of understanding and progress.

The List of Active Evildoers: Evil Incarnate…

Nicolas Maduro: President of Venezuela. Sanctions were placed on current and former government officials, including members of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice (TSJ) and the 2017 Constituent National Assembly (ANC), members of the military and security forces, and private individuals accused of being involved in human rights abuses, degradation in the rule of law, repression of democracy, and corruption. Canada and the E.U. began applying sanctions in 2017.

Ali Khamenei: Iranian leaders of extremist groups who perpetuate violence, suppress education (especially for women), and destabilize entire regions through fear and destruction are clear bandwidth subtractors.

Joseph Biden (Presidential Term 2021 – 2025): Explore an in-depth analysis of how various policies and decisions during Joe Biden’s presidency may have impacted the bandwidth of the United States. This page examines key issues such as economic policies, energy strategies, immigration challenges, public trust in pandemic responses, foreign policy missteps, and social polarization. Learn how these factors have shaped the nation’s capacity for progress, unity, and innovation.

George Soros: A billionaire activist whose financial influence has been linked to destabilizing governments and economies. His Open Society Foundations fund progressive initiatives that critics argue weaken national sovereignty, legal integrity, and social stability. His role in currency manipulation (e.g., breaking the Bank of England in 1992) demonstrates the disruptive power of financial leverage over democratic institutions.

The most left in the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives:

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont): Advocates for large-scale government programs (Medicare for All, free college) that critics argue are fiscally unsustainable and limit market-based solutions
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York): Promotes policies such as the Green New Deal, which proposes extensive government intervention at significant economic cost, with feasibility concerns.
Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota): Has been scrutinized for controversial statements regarding foreign policy and campaign finance practices.
Representative Ayanna Pressley (D-Massachusetts): Pressley advocates for criminal justice reform, healthcare equity, and policies addressing systemic racism.
Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-Michigan): Tlaib emphasizes environmental justice, anti-poverty initiatives, and corporate accountability.
Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington): As the chair of the CPC, Jayapal champions Medicare for All, immigration reform, and workers’ rights.
Representative Cori Bush (D-Missouri): Bush focuses on police defunding, policies that centralize power in federal agencies, reducing individual economic freedom and market-driven solutions.
Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-Illinois): Serving as the CPC’s vice chair, Schakowsky is known for her progressive positions on healthcare, consumer protection, and women’s rights, reducing freedoms of males.
Representative Greg Casar (D-Texas): A newer member of Congress, Casar has been associated with progressive initiatives and is considered part of the expanding group of progressive lawmakers.
Debbie Wassermann-Schultz: An unmitigated loudmouth spokesman for the left. A female schmuck on par with Adam Schiff. Both a disgrace to the intelligence of their heritage.
Amy Klobuchar: Just because…
Lisa Murkowski: One of the first examples of DEI, Murkowski subsequently failed the bar exam four times in a row, passing on her fifth attempt. All around muckraker, often described as one of the Senate’s most Left wing Republicans and a swing vote.
Richard Blumenthal: Of Stolen Valor Fame…

Nancy Pelosi: Former Speaker of the House, Pelosi has been criticized for ethical concerns related to stock trading while in office, leading to bipartisan calls for stronger insider trading laws. Allegations of favoritism and conflicts of interest have raised concerns about the integrity of legislative processes.

Gavin Newsom: As Governor of California, Newsom has overseen policies that have exacerbated homelessness, economic inequality, and crime, while implementing COVID restrictions that were criticized for inconsistency and overreach—often applied selectively while he personally violated them.

Hillary Clinton, Criticized for her role in the Benghazi scandal, the use of a private email server containing classified information, and questionable financial dealings through the Clinton Foundation, which allegedly mismanaged funds for international aid efforts such as in Haiti.

Liz Cheney: Initially a conservative figure, Cheney has been widely criticized for prioritizing political retribution over legislative progress, particularly in her role in the January 6th investigation, which some argue was conducted with partisan bias.

J. B. Pritzker: One of the bullies of the left. As Governor of Illinois, Pritzker has overseen heavy taxation policies and economic regulations that have contributed to an exodus of businesses and individuals from the state, reducing economic bandwidth.

Karen Bass: As Mayor of Los Angeles, Bass has presided over ongoing crises in homelessness and public safety, with policies that critics argue fail to address the root causes effectively.

Jamie Raskin, Jerry Nadler: Both have played key roles in highly partisan impeachment efforts, contributing to political gridlock rather than governance focused on national progress.

Chuck Schumer: As Senate Majority Leader, Schumer has prioritized party politics over bipartisan solutions, contributing to legislative stagnation.

Sheldon Whitehouse: Sold a judgeship.

Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson: Long-time civil rights activists who have been accused of using racial tensions for financial and political gain, including involvement in corporate shakedowns where companies pay for protection from negative publicity.

Elizabeth Warren: Falsely claimed Native American heritage to gain advantages in her academic and professional career. Advocates for wealth redistribution policies that some argue penalize economic success and reduce market efficiency.

Mazie Hirono: Stupid, a disgrace to her race. Oversimplifies complex issues, contributing to political polarization. She is so stupid tou can practically hear Pachinko balls rattling in her head as she speaks.

Maxine Waters: Has made controversial public statements encouraging political confrontation, contributing to social division and reduced bandwidth for civil discourse.

The View: A media platform that amplifies partisan rhetoric and ideological rigidity rather than fostering meaningful debate, reducing the bandwidth of political discourse.

Jimmy Kimmel, Rachel Maddow, Joe Scarborough: Each of these media personalities has been accused of promoting biased narratives, suppressing alternative viewpoints, and engaging in divisive rhetoric, reducing bandwidth for balanced information exchange.

Bill Gates: While a major philanthropic figure, Gates has been criticized for excessive influence over global health policy, monopolistic business practices, and centralized control over food and medicine industries, raising concerns about technocratic overreach and its impact on societal autonomy.

Elizabeth Holmes: Founder of Theranos, a company built on fraudulent claims that misled investors and risked public health, demonstrating deception and corruption at a massive scale. Currently serving a prison sentence for fraud.